The Answer May Surprise You
Showing posts with label fox news blows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fox news blows. Show all posts

Monday, July 16, 2007

Q: Is Bill Kristol the Jonathan Swift of our time?

William 'Bill' Kristol — Don't let his smug expression give you the wrong impression, baby, he's sadKristol: The sneers of a clown

A: Weekly Standard editor and cutting-edge satirist William Kristol wrote a knee-slappingly hilarious editorial for yesterday's Washington Post, "Why Bush Will Be a Winner." I laughed so hard, I shot like a gallon of milk through my nose — and I wasn't even drinking milk!

Kristol packs in such zingers as,
Let's step back from the unnecessary mistakes and the self-inflicted wounds that have characterized the Bush administration. Let's look at the broad forest rather than the often unlovely trees. What do we see?
Hahahahaha! See, it's funny, because you'd have to step back so far, you'd be on like Jupiter.

I hate to give away all the punchlines, but this is his conclusion:
What it comes down to is this: If Petraeus succeeds in Iraq, and a Republican wins in 2008, Bush will be viewed as a successful president.

I like the odds.
OH GOD STOP CAN'T BREATHE!

I haven't read much Weekly Standard, but Alfred E. Newman better watch his back! There's a new funnyman in town!!!!


POSTSCRIPT: Arianna Huffington is under the impression Kristol's whimsical essay was meant literally (she probably thought "A Modest Proposal" was really about eating babies, too). Huffington claims to have ridden in the same Amtrak car with Kristol last week; presumably this occurred in the seventh circle of hell.

Meanwhile, Andrew Sullivan may be onto something. -- 3:13PM

Friday, July 6, 2007

Q: Why are doctors going postal? Part one

The Terrorist Trap | Choose Your Own Adventure #119A: Fox News surprised some people when Roger Friedman, their film critic, called Michael Moore's SiCKO "brilliant". Of course, Fox News being Fox News, they're still leaving room for some healthy fearmongering. As Think Progress reports, yesterday's Your World with Neil Cavuto featured National Review Online columnist Jerry Bowyer warning us how universal health care will get us all killed by terrorists. But there was a delicious irony to Bowyer's comments that Think Progress seems to have missed.

In the transcript, Bowyer argues that the bureaucracy of a public health care system would breed vulnerability:

A state run health care enterprise is bureaucratic, and I think the terrorists have shown over and over again, whether it’s dealing with INS or whether it’s dealing with airport security, they’re very good at gaming the system with bureaucracies. They’re very good at getting around bureaucracies.
(Let's ignore, for a moment, that the recent terrorist threat in London, allegedly orchestrated by foreigners within the national health care system there, was largely unthreatening. Or that every domestic "terrorist" plot we've busted up over the past six years eventually turned out to be either:
  1. the pipe dream of incompetents; or
  2. a work of fiction relayed by the Justice Department and/or Homeland Security; or
  3. some horrific combination of the two.
Have you ignored those things yet? Shouldn't be too tough; most of the populace is already doing it.)

Fox News: Is national healthcare a breeding ground for terrorists?Assuming the terrorist threat is as real and present as the average Neil Cavuto viewer fears, Bowyer seems to be making a valid point. Government bureaucracy is a real problem. Things fall through the cracks here and there. So I guess universal health care could theoretically pose an opportunity for terrorists... right?

Except later in the same segment, Bowyer undermines his point into oblivion:
And if one of your guys is a jihadist, if one of your doctors is spending all the time online reading Osama bin Laden fatwas, someone’s going to notice that. But the National Health Service is more like the post office, you know there’s a lot of anonymity, it’s easy to hide in the bureaucracy.
Hmm, post office? What's this "post office" you speak of? A government bureaucracy that comes into regular contact with, and has access to the homes of, millions of average citizens every day? OMG THAT SOUNDS TERRIFYING. Thank God we're not socialists, or else we might start some kind of "post office" here in the United States. We'd all be killed within hours.

P.S.: If Bowyer thinks the current health care system isn't a crippled bureaucracy, he's apparently never been covered by Kaiser Permanente. I abandoned Kaiser a couple years ago, but from what I remember of the place, by now it must be like the Al Qaeda reading room over there.

P.P.S.: Before you remind me that jihadist mailmen did try to anthrax the bejeezus out of us in 2001 (but then forgot about their nefarious plan and took a nap), it might interest you to learn that all signs point to those attacks being carried out by a government scientist. Specifically, by a government scientist whose career stood to benefit greatly from anthrax hysteria.

Anyway, I'm sure the terrorists will be striking our mailboxes any minute now. Your new issue of TV Guide is probably coated with AIDS. So please remember to be frightened of everything.

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Q: Is there anything funny about Fox News' "The 1/2 Hour News Hour"?

A: As people who know me well1 know, I have a cold, icy, steel heart made of steel and very cold ice; and thus I very rarely Laugh-Out-Loud at anything, unless I'm drunk and/or hitting on you and/or so bewildered by the blackness of mortality that laughter is the only means by which to release the tension in my cold, icy, steel, bronze heart of ice.2

Among the things least likely to coax sincere laughs out of me (e.g., Carlos Mencia; Schindler's List; Carlos Mencia) is the Fox News' 1/2 Hour News Hour, a.k.a., the conservative3 Daily Show, a.k.a., this thing:

VIDEO

(I am averting my eyes and ears. Please tell me when it is over.)

(No, wait, tell me when the hot girl is talking; and then tell me when it is over.)

After watching that, you will surely be surprised when I tell you there is something funny about The 1/2 News Hour: The Comedy Central Insider's coverage of it is very funny. I even found myself LOL'ing at this bit —

Even a brief showing by brilliant alternative comedian Ann Coulter — who, for years, has managed to trick most of the country into believing that he's a vitriolic female conservative — couldn't pull the show above the level of a high school AV club produced parody.4
— after which I was disturbed to find myself sober and alone.

MEANWHILE: Washinton Post TV critic Tom Shales writes that The 1/2 Hour has "funny spots." "In a nutshell," he concludes, "it isn't terrible."

The Washington Monthly's (liberal) Kevin Drum begs to differ, calling it "bad. Really bad." On the other side of the political spectrum, the National Review's David Frum applauds the program's mirthfu—oh, no wait, he hated it even more than the liberal did:
The 1/2 Hour News Hour is not a right-of-center comedy show. It's more like some not very clever left-wing blogger's mean-spirited parody of a right-of-center comedy show: "These right-wingers are so clueless that they would think it funny that Barack Obama's initials are BO."

What a minute ... maybe that's exactly what "The 1/2 Hour News Hour" really is! Maybe it's some ultra-Colbertian exercise in meta-irony: a parody within a parody within a parody... Seriously: The 1/2 Hour News Hour is so unfunny as to be affirmatively insulting.
In a related development, producer Joel Surnow had all of these critics tortured to death.

ANYWAY: T.A.M.S.Y. missed the first episode, but we'll be certain to report back after the follow-up airs, Sunday at 10pm. Unless we forget.

SIDENOTE: It will be interesting to see how much of the surprisingly many Nielsen families who caught the premier come back for more.


1 No one knows me well.
2 I can be commonly found doing all three simultaneously.
3 I should note here — on behalf and in defense of dear reader Sean McWasp — that I am not using the term "conservative" in the traditional sense (e.g., that conservative fellow over there strongly dislikes government wastefulness), but rather in the modern sense, as a synonym for "ignorant and hateful" (e.g., that conservative fellow over there strongly dislikes the mosque through which he just drove a truck).
4 I just noticed this may have been written by Internet comedy veteran and sometime-T.A.M.S.Y. reader Lindsay Lindsayism, to whom I tip my hat.

Wednesday, November 8, 2006

Q: Why is Nancy Pelosi "Standing Tall"?

A: Probably has something to do with the three-inch heels.


She better be careful, though. If the balance of power shifts any further, she might topple over.

(FULL DISCLOSURE: This post is just a flimsy excuse to test out my new screen capture program. Holy crap, is it awesome.)

Q: IS IT MORNING IN AMERICA!?!?

A: Just ask Fox News!



Oh God, the excitement!! I can barely handle it!!!!

(By the way, you've really got to hand it to Fox News. They know how to hammer it home when they want you to think the news is bad. Paired with that photo of a Satanic-looking Nancy Pelosi, celebratory claws outstretched, that headline suddenly looks frightening even to T.A.M.S.Y.)

Monday, August 14, 2006

Q: Who likes it freakier, Marilyn Manson or Bill O'Reilly?

TEMP. Q: Why, God, why can't I get YouTube videos to work?
TEMP. A: As of this writing (3:20pm EST), YouTube remains down for maintenance. Everything should be working normally now.

If you're here looking for the
Bill O'Reilly/Marilyn Manson interview, bookmark this page and try back in a few hours. In the meantime, perhaps you might consider checking out the rest of my blog, The Answer May Surprise You, where mirth meets whimsy meets arousal meets mild brain damage.

All Andrew Sullivan readers under the age of seven receive a free balloon and/or Matt Yglesias bobblehead.


A: Hold on, Marilyn Manson is still famous? Like, he makes records and goes on tour and people pay dollars to see him? Huh. This is the most shocking development since Leah revealed people still "FUCKING LOVE ALICE IN CHAINS."

Anyway, read more after the proverbial jump...

Are popular entertainers corrupting our youth?CLICK ME for Manson vs. O'Reilly | Plus free MP3s from Blur, Supergrass


Because I'm always happy to support a nice Ohio boy, here's Mr. Manson face-to-face with an even dirtier man, Bill O'Reilly.

[hat tip to Andrew Sullivan for the video]

O'Reilly featured Manson as part of his "Children at Risk" feature, in which he imagines that his viewers are young enough to have children. As surprised as I am to discover that people are still listening to Marilyn Manson, I would be even more shocked if anyone under 16 even knows who he is1. He wasn't even that cool when I was 16.

Anyway, the interview is disappointly cordial -- I was hoping Marilyn would, you know, bite the head off a live dove or whatever -- but check out this exchange from around the two-minute mark (especially Bill's classic facial expression at 2:13):
BOR: They tell me that you engaged in a sex act with another man in a stage in Miami. Is that true?
MM: To a certain degree. To a certain degree. It wasn't, ah...
BOR: [face frozen in hilarious disgust]
MM: ...so much a formal sex act. No one was aroused... [describes incident, in which fan jumped on stage, dropped pants, was mock blown or something...]
BOR: But it was shocking.
MM: It was entertaining. To me.
BOR: To you.
MM: To me.
BOR: But if kids saw that, if they saw you simulating, or actually doing, whatever happened, a sex act with another man, maybe they would go out and do it too.
MM: Well, I can't be blamed for something like that. You'd have to blame Richard Simmons, and, uh, [laughing] and Liberace and people like that...
Sorry, Bill. It's going to take a lot more than that to goad Marilyn Manson; he's been answering preposterous questions from reporters since before you were a Factor.


Return to T.A.M.S.Y.'s front page!Pet the lonely kitten to be magically transported to T.A.M.S.Y.'s front page


RELATED: I do have one Marilyn Manson song in my collection, a decent David Bowie cover from the surprisingly unterrible (Dust Brothers-produced) Dead Man on Campus soundtrack. Check it out.

MARILYN MANSON
Golden Years [link expired]

Just for kicks, here are a couple unrelated-but-excellent tracks from that album. T.A.M.S.Y. loves 90s Brit-pop!

BLUR
Cowboy Song
[link expired]

SUPERGRASS
We Still Need More (Than Anyone Can Give) [link expired]

[Dead Man on Campus: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack, 1998]

OBTAIN: Dead Man On Campus | Dissecting Marilyn Manson [Amazon]

1 I am far too lazy to verify that, but if you know something I don't, feel free to drop me a comment.

UPDATE: Added fancier jump image, because I'm obsessed with Photoshop.